Public Protests in Morocco: Rising Discontent Against Israel’s Gaza Offensive and U.S. Policies

Photo: Large Protest in Morocco Calls for End to Israel Ties, Supports Gaza

 

In early April 2025, Morocco witnessed some of its most significant demonstrations in recent months, as tens of thousands of Moroccans gathered in Rabat to protest Israel’s military actions in Gaza. These protests, driven by strong public sentiments, were not only aimed at condemning the violence in Gaza but also expressed growing opposition to the normalization of relations between Morocco and Israel, a policy pushed by the government in recent years. Additionally, the demonstrators voiced their frustration with the United States’ stance on the Palestinian issue, particularly regarding the controversial proposal by President Donald Trump to relocate Palestinians for Gaza’s reconstruction.

This article aims to delve into the reasons behind the protests, analyze the public’s anger, and examine the broader implications for Morocco’s internal and foreign policies.

The Context of Moroccan-Israeli Normalization

In December 2020, Morocco became one of the countries in the Arab world to normalize relations with Israel, a move that was part of the U.S.-brokered Abraham Accords. While the Moroccan government justified the decision as a step toward stability and economic growth – particularly through the opening of diplomatic and commercial ties with Israel – the public response has been far from supportive. Many Moroccans view the normalization as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause, which holds significant cultural and emotional weight in Moroccan society. The Palestinians’ struggle for statehood and freedom resonates deeply with the Moroccan populace, many of whom see the normalization of relations with Israel as an unjustifiable compromise, given the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories and the human rights abuses Palestinians endure.

The protests in Rabat reflect a sentiment that has been building up over the past few years: the sense that the Moroccan government is aligning itself with global powers, particularly the United States and Israel, at the expense of the country’s traditional stance on Palestinian solidarity. Despite the government’s argument that these accords would bring about economic benefits, such as tourism and investment, the protestors view these as hollow justifications when weighed against the moral and ideological principles they hold.

U.S. Influence and the Gaza Reconstruction Proposal

The protests also underscored deep dissatisfaction with U.S. policies in the region. The recent proposal by President Donald Trump to relocate Palestinians for Gaza’s reconstruction sparked outrage across the Arab world, with Morocco being no exception. The idea of resettling Palestinians outside of their homeland as part of the reconstruction plan was seen by many as a blatant disregard for Palestinian sovereignty and an attempt to further undermine the two-state solution. For the Moroccan public, this initiative represents another attempt by the U.S. to manipulate the region’s dynamics for its own geopolitical interests, without regard for the lives and aspirations of the people directly affected by the ongoing conflict.

Moroccan protesters voiced their opposition not only to the U.S. proposal but also to what they see as a broader pattern of U.S. interference in the Middle East, where American policies often prioritize strategic alliances and military interests over human rights and justice. This resentment is amplified by the perception that Morocco’s government is too closely aligned with U.S. foreign policy, which has long been criticized for its one-sided support for Israel.

The Role of the Government: Between Diplomacy and Public Sentiment

The Moroccan government, led by the Justice and Development Party (PJD), has been in a difficult position since the signing of the normalization agreement with Israel. On one hand, the government has argued that normalization brings significant economic opportunities, especially in the fields of trade, technology, and security. On the other hand, the government faces immense domestic pressure to respect public opinion and maintain Morocco’s historical role as a defender of the Palestinian cause.

The protests in Rabat, while peaceful, have clearly demonstrated that public opinion is far from in favor of the government’s policies regarding Israel. The government’s push to align itself with the U.S. and Israel has created a disconnect between the state’s foreign policy objectives and the people’s desires. This tension between the Moroccan government’s pursuit of international alliances and the public’s commitment to longstanding principles of solidarity with the Palestinian people highlights the challenges faced by the ruling elite in balancing external pressures with domestic expectations.

In the face of these protests, the Moroccan government has largely remained silent, offering only limited statements about its commitment to peace and regional stability. This silence may further alienate the government from the people, as it suggests a lack of responsiveness to their concerns. The protests also reveal an underlying mistrust in the government’s transparency and its ability to represent the will of the people in its foreign policy decisions.

The Broader Implications for Moroccan Society and Governance

The protests against Israel’s Gaza offensive and U.S. policies signal a broader disillusionment with the government’s handling of foreign affairs, particularly when it comes to issues that resonate deeply with the Moroccan populace. They also highlight a growing sense of political awakening among the youth, who are increasingly vocal in their opposition to policies they see as compromising Morocco’s values and interests. These young activists, often connected through social media platforms, are using their voices to demand a more independent and principled foreign policy.

Additionally, the protests underscore a larger trend of questioning government decisions on matters that impact national identity and moral integrity. As Morocco continues to navigate its place in a rapidly changing global order, it will need to reconcile its foreign policy with the values of its citizens, who are not hesitant to express their discontent when they feel that their government is acting against their interests or principles.

Conclusion: A Critical Moment for Moroccan Democracy

The public protests in April 2025 have placed the Moroccan government in a difficult position. While it may seek to strengthen ties with the West and secure economic benefits from these alliances, it risks alienating its own citizens, particularly those who feel that the government is betraying Morocco’s historical role as a champion of Palestinian rights.

These protests are not just about Gaza or the U.S. proposal; they represent a larger, ongoing debate about the role of government in representing the people’s will, especially when it comes to foreign policy decisions. As Morocco grapples with this internal conflict, the protests serve as a reminder that no government can disregard public sentiment without consequences. If the ruling elite fails to address these concerns, it could find itself facing more widespread discontent, not just in the streets but at the ballot box as well.

Ultimately, the question remains: will the Moroccan government heed the voices of its people and reassert its commitment to a foreign policy that aligns with national values, or will it continue down the path of international alignment at the expense of domestic harmony? The answer to this question will define Morocco’s political future for years to come.

Disclaimer. The views and opinions expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of MEPEI. Any content provided by our author is of her opinion and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, or anyone or anything.